|
Mahes Visvalingam Customer Talk |
|
This subweb seeks to provide case studies and observations for those undertaking research on Customer Services. The author is not qualified to give any advice and shall not be held liable for any action or outcome arising from readers mistaking the observations and cases provided herein as advice. Readers should consult official sources and seek the advice and assistance of specialist professionals. |
|
PurelyGadgets - unexpected consequences of camcorder purchase
When I checked my account
on the following day, I found that the order status was now flagged as
dispatching. So, I copied this email to both the person
dealing with my order and the Customer Services Manager to say that I
was now confused. I also made them aware that I logged my
experience of Customer Services at:
I received an email the following day from the Customer Services Manager saying that I should receive the order in 2-3 days. Indeed, it arrived the very next day (within 4 days of order) and I would have dismissed this confusion except for the fact that the box had been opened and items were missing.
No
Sony guarantee card and 2 missing items
I was worried that I had been sent a used item when their web had given me no such indication.
Response from purelyGadgets
The English Manual arrived 3 weeks after the product arrived. A week later I received an AC adapter instead of the missing 21-pin adaptor. So, I emailed my contact again with the images of the missing part and pointing out a flaw in the viewfinder (a black line part way across the viewfinder, which could have been dirt or a missing section of pixels). I decided to wait and see whether other problems showed up before sending the product back for repair within the 18 month period.
In
mid-September, I was told that the missing part had been ordered.
In reply to my complaint that I had been sold a used item instead of a
new one, I was told
"The cameras that we sell
are brand new but we are opening them for quality check."
I replied that If the
camcorder was new and was opened for checking purposes, surely quality
control should have noted the missing parts. This makes me wonder if
the camcorder was returned because of the fault.
State at end of 2007 I discussed my purchase with other members of DV forums, and they suggested that I had probably got a grey import. I had never heard of these before and looked it up on the web. See the section on Photographic equipment at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_market. While grey imports are legal, this article also makes it clear that an extended retailer's guarantee may not necessarily be a good buy on expensive items.
I asked the purelyGadgets Customer Services Executive whether my camcorder was a grey import. Despite posing the question in various ways, I always got the same answer - they were unable to tell me whether it was because it was bought in August. Well, you have to draw your own conclusions. I also emailed them to say that I had other concerns listed below. The replies are included.
My verdict on purelyGadgets is still open - they did eventually honour their in stock advert, and delivered what looks like a genuine product within 4 days, and seem willing to put things right. Until I have need of their repair service, I cannot comment how they will handle it nor whether their charges would be reasonable. I am still missing a part and cannot get straight answers. So, I am not entirely satisfied with the Customer Service although I am reasonably happy with the product which has a small flaw in the viewfinder, which can be fixed.
I think that in much the same way in which UK law requires proper food labeling, consumer law should require that grey imports should also be advertised as such so that consumers can ask relevant questions before purchase, e.g. with respect to warranty. I will email ConsumerDirect to this effect.
Blog
|